The research team created mini case studies using TCRP H-52 Park-and-Ride State-of-the-Practice Scan, online research, and other sources. The selection of agencies provides examples of differing strategies in the following areas:
- Modes operated
- Demand estimation method
- Passenger amenities
- Maintenance and state of good repair practices
- Fare policy and fee structure
- Funding sources
- Facility structure and land use
- Stakeholder engagement and community coordination
- Technology to improve safety and security
The objective was to identify candidate transit agencies for in-depth case study. The research team created a mini case study for each of the transit agencies depicted on the map below.
Location of Mini Case Studies
Case studies are available for download: individually by transit agency (listed below in alphabetical order) or as a complete PDF document.
California
- Foothill Transit
- Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (GGBHTD)
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)
- Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain)
- San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
- Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
Colorado
Connecticut
Illinois
- Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
- Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Metra)
- Pace – Suburban Bus Division (Pace)
Massachusetts
Minnesota
New Jersy
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Texas
- Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Capital Metro)
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART)
- Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO)
- Sun Metro
Utah
Virginia
Washington, D.C.
Washington
- Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit)
- Clark County Public Transportation Benefit Area Authority (C-TRAN)
- Intercity Transit
- King County Metro Transit Division (King County Metro)
- Kitsap Transit
- Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (Pierce Transit)
- Snohomish County Public Transportation (Community Transit)